It has been brought to our attention, following a recent publication by Barrell et al. (2019), that the elevations for 12 of 23 boulders reported in our publication, Shulmeister et al., v185, 102–112 (2018) are incorrect. For these 12 samples, the true elevations are higher and hence all exposure ages based on their respective 10Be concentration measurements require a downward correction of between 10 and 15%. This change in age does not alter our main conclusions but does have some implication for the initiation and pace of deglaciation
When the article was first published there was a decimal error in the reporting of the accuracy of t...
Understanding natural climate variability is a fundamental goal of paleoclimate science. Temperate m...
In Table 2, on page 7207, the last eight values for 206Pb/204Pb(t) are incorrect. The corrected ve...
It has been brought to our attention, following a recent publication by Barrell et al. (2019), that ...
Recently, Barrell et al. (2019) published an article that responded to our article (Shulmeister et a...
International audienceWhen this paper was originally published there was an error in Table 1. The ag...
It has been brought to our attention that Table 2 in the paper by Carrivick et al. (2022) “A reconst...
peer reviewedWhen this paper was originally published, there was an error in Fig. 7g. Indeed the cur...
The authors named above have discovered a small error in the calibration of marine radiocarbon ages ...
The authors regret that an error in Fig. 16 was made in the paper. The cohesion number Co was calcul...
Cosmogenic nuclide dating of glacial landforms may lead to ambiguous results for ice retreat histori...
International audienceIn the version of this Article originally published, the symbols for `greater ...
The authors regret that the printed version of the above article contained a transcription error in ...
Stratigraphic evidence and extensive optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) geochronology from an 1...
Stratigraphic evidence and extensive optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) geochronology from an 1...
When the article was first published there was a decimal error in the reporting of the accuracy of t...
Understanding natural climate variability is a fundamental goal of paleoclimate science. Temperate m...
In Table 2, on page 7207, the last eight values for 206Pb/204Pb(t) are incorrect. The corrected ve...
It has been brought to our attention, following a recent publication by Barrell et al. (2019), that ...
Recently, Barrell et al. (2019) published an article that responded to our article (Shulmeister et a...
International audienceWhen this paper was originally published there was an error in Table 1. The ag...
It has been brought to our attention that Table 2 in the paper by Carrivick et al. (2022) “A reconst...
peer reviewedWhen this paper was originally published, there was an error in Fig. 7g. Indeed the cur...
The authors named above have discovered a small error in the calibration of marine radiocarbon ages ...
The authors regret that an error in Fig. 16 was made in the paper. The cohesion number Co was calcul...
Cosmogenic nuclide dating of glacial landforms may lead to ambiguous results for ice retreat histori...
International audienceIn the version of this Article originally published, the symbols for `greater ...
The authors regret that the printed version of the above article contained a transcription error in ...
Stratigraphic evidence and extensive optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) geochronology from an 1...
Stratigraphic evidence and extensive optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) geochronology from an 1...
When the article was first published there was a decimal error in the reporting of the accuracy of t...
Understanding natural climate variability is a fundamental goal of paleoclimate science. Temperate m...
In Table 2, on page 7207, the last eight values for 206Pb/204Pb(t) are incorrect. The corrected ve...